Відео

Very much enjoyed the movie , It was decent movie if You appreciate horror art do really appreciate and enjoyed it alot hope they do a part 2

Johnny had a motive for his killing. The locket. Which makes it more disturbing to me because it’s not random brutality. It’s methodical rage.

I was crying while acting this on the plane such an bittersweet ending.

Has nothing against Terrifier.

He stopped killing after Chris left the necklace. Once he reclaimed it he stops killing. This goes against everything the woman talks about. She claims animals kill for no reason sometimes until they are satisfied. Johnny was just mad someone took his locket which meant a lot to him (from his father). One major point I noticed is as soon as the locket is taken from Johnny’s grave site, the whole movie is in Johnny’s perspective. After the girl leaves the locket and runs away, the POV is of the girl. That means the killing as stopped and Johnny returned to sleep

This movie was god awful

get a life😊

Feel like I’m the only person that loves this film haha. At least from what I’ve seen online

The moment I really liked was when he was playing with the toy car. And almost seemed like he could let it all go but then when he heard the voices it snapped them back to reality and then the anger just washed all over him again purpose renewed

Where can I watch it?

Literally could have been a 20 minute movie

awful, pointless movie. maybe i'm just not defective enough to enjoy it.

This short film made me feel like throwing up and crying.

This short film gives me some The Shining vibes but more disturbing. It's a well-directed film.

Happy to see Halsey stepping into acting. She had a real charisma that im sure shows up on screen.

According to everything I have ever read, the word “nosferatu” is completely made up - this word is not Romanian and, in fact does not appear in any known language.

I feel like for movies like Inception, these videos make sense. For movies like this, if you really need this ending, that isn't an open for interpretation or an ambiguous ending you are an Idiot. The movie has a clear simple ending that shouldn't need an explanation. The title should just be. "Movie recap and my thoughts" there fixed it

Imagine if Scream 6 didn't kill of the first 2 killers... the ones planning on killing the Carpenter sisters. The one the real killers killed before the title card.. Instead, the movie continued with them as the killer, and we followed them around and learned all the details and how they act from them and only the characters DK who the Killer(s) are. We'd see how and why they want to kill their friends. The way they plan and plot on who to kill next and why.. That concept works because they know and have a connection to the other characters. It would work way better than this did. That being said.. this movie is good. Don't take this comment as me hating or criticizing the movie. I'm not. This is just my thought/ opinion.. also It isn't great. It isn't bad. It's slightly above mid.. maybe because it was so hyped up. This movie is highly highly over hyped. I usually don't let that change my expectations this time it did, and it did NOT meet them. The killer, setting, and characters are a straight rip-off of F13. A zombie pretty much. Same build and junpsuit as Jason. He even wear the potato bag for some of the movies and had a mask change like Jason. They are at a camp like Jason . These are NOT complaints, just my thoughts on the movie. Besides the perspective switch, nothing is original and creative, and it definitely doesn't set a standard. idk what he is talking about with that. It isn't groundbreaking. It is a random guy who is basically a zombie. There is no connection to the victims. That is why i think the perspective switch was wasted. Would have been better it it just followed the group around. If he was a friend killing off his friend group and had an actual connection to the victims it would have made the perspective way better. That is why I want to see the Idea on a scream movie or some kind of whodunit slasher. Imagine if he personally knew the victims and went camping with them as a friend who is secretly a killer. How cool? Instead of some random guy like jason who just kills a random group. The movie is good. I'm not going to re watch it, and besides 1 or 2 kills It won't stick with me

The movie started off good, but the stupidity and unrealistic choices the characters made had me hating the movie by the end. While I sat there yelling at the screen, "WHAT THE F0_0K," By the end of the Movie. I was not genuinely scared at all while watching this movie. I was entertained by the gore though.

I haven't even seen the movie and can't stop looking stuff up about it....I can't wait to see this movie

Calling it now, i think it was called the most ambitious project for a reason. Mia goth stated that in an interview the night that pearl premiered that she read the whole script and called it her favorite one, and i think its because she kills the killer in one big showdown. the whole world would know her name somehow, they never said in what context. someone doesnt just want her dead, they want her image dead too.

Every time Frodo went out of frame, I was afraid for Frodo’s safety but I was glad he made it alive in the end; I was rooting for him the whole time, besides the main characters lol

Love the bass in the song, also love what BLOND:ISH did with it!!

I feel like a quiet place could have been done well but it was so dumb. They decided to have a kid to replace the kid they lost but knew how loud it would be…. Putting their still living kids in danger. The dad could have throw the axe into the metal building to distract the monster but he instead yelled and got killed. Like lots of problems

FIRST thanks for breaking my heart about Lupita....at least she got a pizza and the cat lived ... Uugh 😢😢😢😂

No way it gets oscar recognition. The academy never nominates horror films unfortunately

(also fyi Bough is pronounced like Baow, not like Bow like the ribbon)

"We'll be using code words" *minutes later* "HE GOUGED HER EYES OUT WITH A SCREWDRIVER AND PEELED HER FACE OFF WITH A VEGETABLE PEELER"

So it’s basically a lot like Friday The 13th with Jason Voorhees

Movie is wack asf waste of time

A 10 minute bear story shot with bad green screen. The edges of the faces became slightly blurred. In and out of focus while the interior of the vehicle "bounced" to simulate driving. With a FINAL GIRL who did not deserve that moniker. I firmly believe the writer(s) did not know what to do after the killing was over.

Not funerals. A Plague

You do know that the plot is just lifted straight from Dracula, right?

The movie was terrible and depressing and most people are sick of hearing about transexual Bull crap and the whole gay community in general. What a bunch of narcissist.

I find it frustrating that most of these reaction/breakdown/analysis-videos mostly just resort to telling us what is clearly happening on screen rather than giving any insight as to what the scenes might mean and whatever influences the director might have taken. It gives the impression that most of these s.c. movie channels don't really know that much about the movies they are supposed to talk about (or movies in general). It's like Snoop Dogg commentating on the Olympics (but less entertaining). Here's what I found interesteing about the trailer. Hopefully someone else picked up other stuff and we can have an interesting discussion * The first shot from the trailer is probably from the end of the movie when Ellen has realized that in order to save her husband and the town she has to sacrifice herself to Nosferatu. It might be earlier in the movie when she is praying for her husband to come home from Transylvania or she might be under some spell. However, if you look at the 1922 or 1979 version the first explanation is the most plausible. The shot of her getting strangled (presumably by Nosferatu) and lying on a grave is probably from earlier in the movie. There are photos of Lily-Rose Depp where she seems to be acting out the sleepwalking scenes from the 1922 version of the film so that is most likely where that scene is from. That scene is also present in the Bram Stoker's novel when Lucy Westenra sleepwalks out into the garden to have an encounter with Dracula. * The shot of the shadow of the hand hovering over Wismar is taken straight from another F.W. Murnau movie - Faust. It's cool that Robert Eggers included that homage in this movie. * A lot of the costumes seems to be more or less exact replicas from the 1922 movie. A good example would be when Thomas Hutter is riding away from Wismar. That outfit seem to be a 1 to 1 copy of what Hutter was wearing in the original * It will be interesting to see what role Albin Ebenhart von Franz is having in this movie. In the original the van Helsing character is more or less absent and in the 1979 version he is a minor character that only really plays a part in the ending. While it is well know that Willem Dafoe often accepts minor roles in movies he finds interesting his presence in the trailer gives the impression that the role is expanded in this movie. There is also the photo of him laughing like a madman while torching what might be Nosferatu's grave so he definitely seems to be more pre-active in this version. * A lot of people seem to think that the shot of the naked man sitting on the floor surrounded by candles is Nosferatu. I don't think so. I think it is Herr Knock, the Renfield character of this movie. It makes more sense for a deranged lunatic to be doing that kind of stuff rather than a cold, menacing manifestation of evil and pestilence. * It will also be interesting to see what this version has in store for Thomas Hutter. The 1922 and 1979 versions have wildly different outcomes for that character so it will be interesting to see what Eggers does with him. The scene of him writhing on the table while some nuns are staring blankly at him is not from either version so Eggers might have come up with a third outcome. Or maybe he is going back to the Stoker novel, where a sick and delerious Harker manages to escape Dracula's castle and finds himself in a Romanian convent, being nursed back to health by the nuns. * The scene with Ellen Hutter in bed saying "He is coming" has her almost moaning in pleasure and if you look at the - very brief - scene where von Franz is saying "Tell me, child! Who is coming?" you can see that she is smiling and her eyes are not focused. Maybe Eggers has taken inspiration from Bram Stoker's book and included a version of the scene where van Helsing hypnotizes Mina Murray to find out the location of Dracula. That is not present in the 1922 or 1979 version. * The trailer also show Hutter and von Franz driving a stake through someone or something. In the other versions of this film there is no mention of the vampire hunters (van Helsing, Jonathan Harker, Lord Arthur Holmwood, Quincey Morris and and Dr. Seward) present in the Bram Stoker novel. Maybe they have been re-introduced in this version. * The scene with van Franz opening an old tome and saying "We are here encountering the vampyr, Nosferatu!" is not from either earlier vesrions. Instead it almost mirrors a scene in the 1992 movie "Bram Stoker's Dracula" when van Helsing (Anthony Hopkins) opens a similar looking tome and says something similar. Maybe it's an homage to that movie. Anyway. That is just what I have picked up. Hopefully someone else can offer more insight.

I find it frustrating that most of these reaction/breakdown/analysis-videos mostly just resort to telling us what is clearly happening on screen rather than giving any insight as to what the scenes might mean and whatever influences the director might have taken. It gives the impression that most of these s.c. movie channels don't really know that much about the movies they are supposed to talk about (or movies in general). It's like Snoop Dogg commentating on the Olympics (but less entertaining). Here's what I found interesteing about the trailer. Hopefully someone else picked up other stuff and we can have an interesting discussion * The first shot from the trailer is probably from the end of the movie when Ellen has realized that in order to save her husband and the town she has to sacrifice herself to Nosferatu. It might be earlier in the movie when she is praying for her husband to come home from Transylvania or she might be under some spell. However, if you look at the 1922 or 1979 version the first explanation is the most plausible. The shot of her getting strangled (presumably by Nosferatu) and lying on a grave is probably from earlier in the movie. There are photos of Lily-Rose Depp where she seems to be acting out the sleepwalking scenes from the 1922 version of the film so that is most likely where that scene is from. That scene is also present in the Bram Stoker's novel when Lucy Westenra sleepwalks out into the garden to have an encounter with Dracula. * The shot of the shadow of the hand hovering over Wismar is taken straight from another F.W. Murnau movie - Faust. It's cool that Robert Eggers included that homage in this movie. * A lot of the costumes seems to be more or less exact replicas from the 1922 movie. A good example would be when Thomas Hutter is riding away from Wismar. That outfit seem to be a 1 to 1 copy of what Hutter was wearing in the original * It will be interesting to see what role Albin Ebenhart von Franz is having in this movie. In the original the van Helsing character is more or less absent and in the 1979 version he is a minor character that only really plays a part in the ending. While it is well know that Willem Dafoe often accepts minor roles in movies he finds interesting his presence in the trailer gives the impression that the role is expanded in this movie. There is also the photo of him laughing like a madman while torching what might be Nosferatu's grave so he definitely seems to be more pro-active in this version. * A lot of people seem to think that the shot of the naked man sitting on the floor surrounded by candles is Nosferatu. I don't think so. I think it is Herr Knock, the Renfield character of this movie. It makes more sense for a deranged lunatic to be doing that kind of stuff rather than a cold, menacing manifestation of evil and pestilence. * It will also be interesting to see what this version has in store for Thomas Hutter. The 1922 and 1979 versions have wildly different outcomes for that character so it will be interesting to see what Eggers does with him. The scene of him writhing on the table while some nuns are staring blankly at him is not from either version so Eggers might have come up with a third outcome. Or maybe he is going back to the Stoker novel, where a sick and delerious Harker manages to escape Dracula's castle and finds himself in a Romanian convent, being nursed back to health by the nuns. * The scene with Ellen Hutter in bed saying "He is coming" has her almost moaning in pleasure and if you look at the - very brief - scene where von Franz is saying "Tell me, child! Who is coming?" you can see that she is smiling and her eyes are not focused. Maybe Eggers has taken inspiration from Bram Stoker's book and included a version of the scene where van Helsing hypnotizes Mina Murray to find out the location of Dracula. That is not present in the 1922 or 1979 version. * The trailer also show Hutter and von Franz driving a stake through someone or something. In the other versions of this film there is no mention of the vampire hunters (van Helsing, Jonathan Harker, Lord Arthur Holmwood, Quincey Morris and and Dr. Seward) present in the Bram Stoker novel. Maybe they have been re-introduced in this version. * The scene with von Franz opening an old tome and saying "We are here encountering the vampyr, Nosferatu!" is not from either earlier vesrions. Instead it almost mirrors a scene in the 1992 movie "Bram Stoker's Dracula" when van Helsing (Anthony Hopkins) opens a similar looking tome and says something similar. Maybe it's an homage to that movie. Anyway. That is just what I have picked up. Hopefully someone else can offer more insight.

Ok, here it comes.

The person on the horse is Hutter. Watch the old film

I didn’t know trailers needed to be explained.

If this was horror than no wonder kids sre getting so fat today. This is where some tell me how i just wasnt bright enough to grasp the metaphors and symbolism within the movie and other such artsy bs. Such hype for this movie, and did not deliver in any aspect at all. I loved " Vivarium" as an example of a " horror" movie whose protaganist is undefined and/ or a representation of inner fears caused by self esteem issues with repressed sexualism or not coming to terms with mommy dying at such a vulnerable age. Anyway i cut it ,a huge pile o poop is all i can call this flick

I think they should do a sequel covering the original Omen through part 3 because the timeline was always dodgy and this gives them a chance to make a solid timeline

The monologue is a love or hate factor of the film . I personally loved it and think it was the best part of the film but I have also heard that some people walked out of the theatre during that part . 😅 Great film , challenging film

Agreed.Night stalker targeted San Gabriel valley (suburbs) not Hollywood. I lived through it.

I haven't been to the theatres in a LONG time, but this might be the first film in ages I'm genuinely interested in seeing on the big-screen.

I have not seen either X or Pearl but I will at some point I am also definitely planning on watching Maxxxine as someone who is a Model myself with aspirations to explore the world of motion picture I kinda connect to the character on that level the desire to be famous be on a world stage prove that you are somebody I think this home for a lot of us its like we are Maxxine in some way lol

I think it’s Kevin bacon

All I’m saying is that one of your theories is correct. I know some stuff about the film.

I cant wait